- About UNAIDS
- Our work
- Targets and commitments
- 2011 Political Declaration: Targets and elimination commitments
- Reducing sexual transmission
- Preventing HIV among drug users
- Eliminating new HIV infections among children
- 15 million accessing treatment
- Avoiding TB deaths
- Closing the resource gap
- Eliminating gender inequalities
- Eliminating stigma and discrimination
- Eliminating travel restrictions
- Strengthening HIV integration
- 2011 Political Declaration: Targets and elimination commitments
Documents
- TRIPS transition period extensions for least-developed countries
- The heavy disease burden on LDCs, including for HIV, Hepatitis C and TB, provides an urgent and compelling case for the international community to take all measures possible to protect and extend the health of the people living in these countries.
- Global AIDS response progress reporting 2013: Construction of core indicators for monitoring the 2011 UN political declaration on HIV/AIDS
- To inform the midterm review, UNAIDS is requesting countries to provide their most recent data for 2012, using the indicators in this document. This data will serve countries in conducting their own midterm reviews, helping countries to focus on the areas where action is most needed to reach countries' priority targets and elimination commitments by 2015.
- Efficient and Sustainable HIV Responses: Case studies on country progress
- As the world economic landscape changes, so too does the HIV funding landscape. The limited resources available require more emphasis on value for money. This case study report consists of eight case studies. It highlights countries’ progress in making their HIV response more efficient or increasing domestic HIV funding, contributing to sustainability, increased scale-up and country ownership. Cambodia and Myanmar have re-allocated resources towards high-impact interventions. South Africa and Swaziland have saved millions by improving their antiretroviral drug tenders. Kenya, Namibia, Malawi and Kazakhstan have taken active steps for a future with fewer external funds. Each country has evolved strategies that other countries may apply to their particular context. The examples given here aim to catalyse country-driven action to make efficiency and sustainably funded HIV services the reality in the HIV response.