Ghana’s efforts to end AIDS has long relied on international support, particularly from the United States. Recent US funding cuts, however, have led to the suspension of critical programmes including human rights, raising concerns for key populations most affected by HIV-related stigma and discrimination.

In this interview, Hector Sucilla Perez, UNAIDS Country Director for Ghana, talks about the current state of the HIV response, the consequences of these funding changes, and the next steps for the country’s HIV response. 

Q: What is the current state of Ghana’s HIV epidemic? 

Ghana has an estimated 330 000 people living with HIV, with two-thirds being women aged 15 and over. In 2023 alone, there were 18 000 new infections and 12 000 AIDS-related deaths. The most affected groups are transgender women, men who have sex with men, female sex workers, and women. While new infections and deaths have decreased over the last decade, the reduction is far below expectations—only a 19% drop in new infections and 35% in deaths since 2010. The country needs to speed up more in the way we are decreasing new infections and deaths. 

Ghana’s HIV response is heavily dependent on international donors. In 2022, Ghana's total expenditure on HIV and AIDS-related activities was approximately US$ 126 million. The Global Fund covers about 29% of this, PEPFAR (the US President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief) about 8.5%, and the UN about 4.5%. PEPFAR support in Ghana has been essential and critical, investing more than US$ 204 million since 2007, mainly in HIV prevention, testing, treatment support, monitoring, and human rights work. 

 Q: What specific activities has PEPFAR been supporting in Ghana? 

PEPFAR works in three regions of Ghana, (Western, Western North, and Ahafo), supporting essential catalytic services related to HIV prevention, including PrEP, as well as diagnosis, testing, treatment, and support services. They have also been supporting monitoring and evaluation to strengthen health information systems and improve data accuracy, which is critical for guiding our response. 

Additionally, PEPFAR has been implementing human rights programmes with special emphasis on eliminating HIV-related stigma and discrimination. While they do not procure antiretroviral treatment in Ghana, they provide key technical assistance to the health sector on supply chain management for drugs and commodities.

 Q: What has been the impact of the recent US funding cuts? 

The initial pause in US government support affected activities in more than 120 healthcare sites across two regions, affecting 10 civil society organizations collaborating on PEPFAR-implemented programmes. 

Some critical PEPFAR-supported actions were thereafter reinstated due to the waiver, particularly those related to the 95-95-95 targets, with a focus on vulnerable populations, especially adolescent girls and young women, and pregnant women. Monitoring, evaluation, data collection, and technical support for supply chain management were also reinstated. 

However, strategic activities related to human rights with emphasis on stigma and discrimination, community-led monitoring, and interventions focusing on key populations have been definitively suspended. This represents a significant challenge for Ghana's HIV response. 

Q: How is Ghana responding to these funding cuts, particularly regarding human rights programmes? 

The government, through the Ghana AIDS Commission, has re-established and reinvigorated the Human Rights Stream Committee supported by UNAIDS and the Global Fund Grant. The Committee is currently to analyzing how the country can take over some of these activities. They are looking at integrating HIV more deeply into actions implemented by other government partners such as the Commission for Human Rights and Administrative Justice (CHRAJ), and increasing collaboration with the Ministry of Gender and Social Protection and the Ministry of Labour. UNAIDS provides technical assistance in support to these efforts. 

We are also supporting CHRAJ to develop a handbook on stigma and discrimination through the lens of HIV, health and rights as a sustainable way of embedding continuous professional development in the work of this Government entity on actions focused to address HIV stigma and discrimination. 

UNAIDS in Ghana is also strengthening community leadership particularly networks of PLHIV and key populations to play an important role in leading harmonized CLM initiatives in Ghana in collaboration with Global Fund implementers. This is by means of technical assistance and hands on support to communities to develop concrete priorities aligned to key data gaps, including stigma and discrimination and linkages to treatment adherence. 

UNAIDS has also engaged with the Global Fund to explore using efficiencies in their grants to cover these activities. The Global Fund has shown willingness to potentially develop a strategy where all stakeholders can contribute to maintaining the most relevant human rights activities in Ghana. 

Q: What new initiatives are being developed to address these gaps? 

The UNAIDS country office is developing an umbrella strategy called the "Ghana for Rights Initiative." We envision this as a national movement aimed at promoting and protecting human rights in Ghana, especially for those most affected by inequality, discrimination, and stigma. 

This initiative goes beyond the regular framework for HIV response, focusing more comprehensively on human rights issues such as gender equality, rights of persons in vulnerable situations, access to healthcare and education, and eradication of HIV-related stigma and discrimination. 

The key components are advocacy, capacity building, and community engagement, with a strong emphasis on community-led monitoring. We are accelerating discussions with country partners, including the government, bilateral donors, communities, and the UN agencies to frame human rights in a different approach and mobilize resources for the country to continue priority work on HIV and human rights intersectional agenda. 

 Q: What are your concerns if human rights programmes remain suspended? 

Without these critical human rights programmes, we risk seeing increased stigma and discrimination against people living with HIV and key populations. This could reverse progress made in encouraging people to get tested and access treatment, ultimately leading to more new infections and AIDS-related deaths. 

The suspension of community-led monitoring also means we lose vital data and feedback from those most affected by HIV, making our response less effective and less targeted to real needs on the ground. This is why we are urgently working to find alternative approaches and funding sources to maintain these essential services. 

 Q: What is your message to the international community? 

Now is not the time to step back from supporting the global HIV response. The progress we have made over the past years—reducing new infections, expanding access to treatment, and fighting stigma—has only been possible because of strong international solidarity and partnership. The recent US funding cuts have significantly impacted Ghana’s HIV programmes , especially those focused on human rights, stigma, and discrimination, which are essential to reaching the most marginalized and people in vulnerable situations . 

We urge donors, development partners, and the global community to continue investing in the global HIV response especially in countries like Ghana, particularly in areas that protect and promote human rights. Without this support, we risk reversing decades of progress and leaving behind those who are most in need. Sustained international commitment is crucial to ensure that Ghana can achieve the UNAIDS 95-95-95 targets by 2030 and, ultimately, end AIDS as a public health threat. 

We also invite all partners to join us in innovative approaches, such as the “Ghana for Rights Initiative,” to build a future where everyone—regardless of gender, status, or identity—can live free from stigma, discrimination, and the burden of HIV. 

As international funding declines, countries reliant on global support to fight HIV are being forced to adapt, and fast. In Tajikistan, the impact of these changes is already being felt. We spoke with Aziza Hamidova, UNAIDS Country Director in Tajikistan, about the country’s achievements over the years, the immediate impact of US funding cuts, and what is at stake for the most vulnerable communities.

Q: How would you describe the progress Tajikistan has made in its HIV response before the recent US funding cuts? 

Tajikistan has made significant progress in its HIV response over recent years. Since 2020, HIV-related mortality has halved. Programmatic data on vertical transmission rates among women in care, suggests the rates have dropped from 2.6% in 2018 to just 0.8% in 2024, with only one case registered this year. Blood transfusion safety has been flawless for nearly 22 years, thanks to efforts by the Global Fund, UNAIDS, and other partners. Antiretroviral treatment costs have also been dramatically reduced—from US $254 to under US $65 per year—due to partnerships with PEPFAR, the Global Fund, and UNAIDS. Antiretroviral therapy is now available to all people living with HIV in the country. Outreach and awareness programmes, particularly for key populations such as people who inject drugs, men who have sex with men, sex workers, young people, and women living with HIV, have ensured good treatment coverage and testing rates. Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP-medicine to prevent HIV) had also been available and promoted through civil society organizations. Importantly, community-led monitoring had become a critical, institutionalized part of the national HIV programme.

Q: What immediate impacts have the US funding cuts had on Tajikistan’s HIV response? 

While the provision of basic HIV services, including testing and treatment at state healthcare facilities, has not been significantly affected—thanks mainly to Global Fund support—there have been notable reductions in outreach and access to services for key populations. PEPFAR’s investments have been crucial in improving the quality and reach of these services. As a result of the funding cuts, outreach, access to PrEP, testing, and counselling have all diminished. Two highly popular community health centres, known for providing stigma-free services, have closed, and community services for key population groups served by these centres have been completely stopped. Community-led monitoring, a vital mechanism for ensuring programme impact and accountability, has also been discontinued.

Q: What are you hearing from communities directly affected by these closures and service reductions? 

Our partners and beneficiaries are reporting the suspension of awareness work, interruptions in comprehensive support programmes, and worsening mental health. We have observed a decreased adherence to antiretroviral therapy, particularly among clients who previously relied on community-led organizations or health centres. Many individuals who were on PrEP no longer feel safe or supported and have dropped out of the programme.

In addition, skilled professionals who provided these services have faced emotional burnout and job instability, with some leaving the sector altogether. Community-led organizations that lost funding for community-led monitoring are now unable to participate meaningfully in advocacy and policymaking or the implementation of the national HIV programme.

Although PEPFAR funding for community health centres and outreach was temporarily restored at the end of April, we are still seeing reduced rates of testing and client engagement, with a number of clients lost to follow-up.

Q: How have the government and partners responded to the funding cuts, and what is UNAIDS doing to support them?

Tajikistan never planned to remain dependent on external support indefinitely.

In 2024, with UNAIDS support, the country conducted a National AIDS Spending Assessment assessment, revealing that over 60% of the national HIV programme was funded externally, mainly by the Global Fund and the US government. In response, the government, with support from UNAIDS, PEPFAR, and the Global Fund, developed its first HIV Sustainability Roadmap, aiming for national programme sustainability by 2030. The abrupt funding interruption was a shock to all stakeholders, prompting emergency actions by the government. Strategic prioritization is now underway with the support of UNAIDS, and while additional state budget funding has been allocated for 2026, it remains insufficient. Mobilizing further external resources, especially for key populations, is still necessary.

Q: What would happen if US funding is not restored or replaced? 

If US funding is not restored or replaced, Tajikistan would be set to lose about 60% of its HIV programme funding. This would risk the progress that we all worked so hard for, potentially returning the country to a time when access to testing and treatment was limited. Disruptions in prevention, testing, treatment, and care would occur, and gains achieved over years of dedicated work could quickly unravel. The most vulnerable populations would be at greatest risk, and the overall effectiveness of the national HIV response would be severely compromised.

Q: What message do you have for the international community? 

The HIV response in Tajikistan, as in many countries, is a testament to the power of global solidarity and smart investments. Collective action by donors, governments, organizations, communities and civil society has saved millions of lives. Now, when we are so close to the 2030 goal of ending AIDS, this solidarity must not falter. Continued support is essential to preserve progress and prevent a reversal of the gains made.

The Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) leads the global effort to end AIDS as a public health threat by 2030 as part of the Sustainable Development Goals.

Following the US funding cuts in January, UNAIDS is working closely with governments and partners in affected countries to ensure that all people living with or affected by HIV continue to access life-saving services. For the latest updates, please visit unaids.org

Ethiopia, with a population of 130 million, is Africa’s second most populous country. Despite steady economic growth approaching low-middle income status, the country faces a daunting number of challenges, from economic pressures and development needs to recurring natural disasters such as droughts and floods, as well as conflict and other man-made crises. These factors mean Ethiopia still relies heavily on external aid-particularly for food security and humanitarian assistance. 

On top of these existing burdens, HIV remains a significant public health challenge. The country is home to an estimated 610 000 people living with HIV, with over half a million currently on life-saving antiretroviral treatment-most of which is funded by international donors. Recent cuts in US funding have put Ethiopia’s HIV response at risk, threatening to reverse years of progress and placing additional strain on an already fragile health system.

We sat down with Tina Boonto, UNAIDS Country Director for Ethiopia, to discuss the impact of the funding crisis, the government’s response, the resilience of communities, and what needs to happen next to protect Ethiopia’s HIV response.

Q: What is the current situation, and how has the recent US funding crisis impacted the HIV response?

Ethiopia has made significant progress in its HIV response in recent years and is on track to reach the UNAIDS 95-95-95 targets with 90% of people living with HIV in the country being aware of their HIV status; 94% of those diagnosed with HIV receiving antiretroviral (ARV) therapy; and 96% of people on ARV therapy achieving viral suppression. The US Government through PEPFAR and the Global Fund have been the primary funders for the HIV response, supporting treatment for over 530 000 of the estimated 600 000 people living with HIV in the country. However, the sudden cuts had a devastating impact. Critical services have stopped, people have lost their jobs, and many clinics have closed their doors. People living with HIV now face uncertainty about their access to medication, testing, and prevention services. 

In Bahir Dar, for example, programmes for key population have stopped, outreach workers have lost their jobs, and peer support groups have been terminated. It’s heartbreaking to see the situation on the ground. Clients arrived at clinics to find them closed, and many were left without guidance or support. 

Women are anxious about the availability of medication and prevention tools like condoms. Without these, the risk of HIV transmission increases, and the health of those already living with HIV deteriorates. Some cannot even afford basic necessities like food, let alone treatment. 

Q: How are communities responding to the collapse of HIV services? 

Despite the collapse, communities are showing incredible resilience and a fighting spirit. Peer educators, youth groups and mothers are stepping in where formal systems are failing. For example, in the Afar region, a case manager working with people living with HIV continued his outreach work despite funding cuts. He was able to get funding from the health bureau and shared “even if the money is not enough, I’m happy to continue to help reach people living with HIV, providing pregnant women information on how to prevent transmission to their babies”. 

But while these community-led efforts are inspiring, they cannot replace the need for sustainable funding. Community members often live below adequate income levels, and they need support for basics like transport and food. UNAIDS is encouraging the government to consider a social contract with community organizations-similar to Ethiopia’s successful Health Extension Worker model-so that peer outreach workers can be formally supported and paid for their essential outreach work. 

The reason why we are pushing for outreach workers to be supported is because stigma and discrimination remain significant barriers. Even after 40 years of the HIV epidemic, people living with HIV in Ethiopia still experience stigma, which deters them from seeking care at public facilities. Many fear being discriminated against or not receiving adequate services. This is why the role of community peer outreach is so vital. Without armies of community outreach workers, especially in high-burden areas, it’s impossible to have a successful HIV programme. 

 Q: What lessons can be drawn from this crisis for the future of HIV response in Ethiopia and beyond? 

The crisis has exposed the fragility of systems built around a single funding stream. When the money stopped, so did services, trust, and hope. We must build resilience into the system from the start. Community-led organizations must be recognized as essential, and youth-led innovation must be scaled up. Emergency preparedness and integrated, people-centered solutions are crucial, especially as HIV intersects with conflict, displacement, and gender-based violence. HIV must remain central to humanitarian, development and recovery agendas-not as an afterthought, but as a foundation.

UNAIDS is also supporting by working on producing an investment case to prioritize key components of the HIV programme for government funding. There are ongoing discussions about new partnerships with the private sector and exploring alternative financing mechanisms. There is political will. The Ministry of Health is considering adopting the methodology of the HIV Sustainability Roadmap to develop a broader health sector sustainability strategy. UNAIDS is supporting these efforts by helping to produce a sustainability strategy and mobilizing resources alongside other donors

Q: What steps is the Ethiopian government taking to address the funding crisis?

The government recognizes this as a wake-up call and is actively considering solutions to find resources to cover priority health issues, including HIV, tuberculosis, and malaria. However, the scale of the challenge is enormous-external assistance for Ethiopia’s health, humanitarian and development needs amounts to around US$ 2.7 billion annually. The government is exploring options such as introducing a social tax, where all workers would contribute to health funding, but this is still under parliamentary discussion. While these efforts are encouraging, they are not yet sufficient to fill the gap left by international donors. 

Q: How is UNAIDS supporting the government and the HIV response during this crisis? 

UNAIDS is playing a critical role. In response to the funding crisis, we conducted immediate impact surveys to understand which programmes have stopped or are ongoing, and what the consequences are on the ground. This information feeds into the national plans and sustainability plan.

We are also producing an investment case to help the government prioritize key components of the HIV programme for domestic funding. Our costing data enables us to propose affordable models, like social contracting with community organizations.

We are reviving HIV prevention efforts, including using AI-powered digital platforms and chatbots to reach young people with real-time information. Ethiopia was also piloting long-acting injectable antiretroviral medicine to prevent HIV or ‘PrEP’ before the funding cuts stopped this progress.

Finally, we are working closely with the Ministry of Health, the Global Fund, and community organizations to mobilize resources and advocate for integrated, sustainable solutions. 

Q: What is your message to the international community at this critical juncture?

We need global solidarity now more than ever. We are so close to ending AIDS as a public health threat by 2030. Over half a million people in Ethiopia are on antiretroviral treatment—we cannot let them down. The world has come too far, and too many have sacrificed too much to let progress slip away now. We must do everything possible to keep the lights on for the HIV response, both in Ethiopia and globally.

The resilience of Ethiopian communities is inspiring. People are refusing to give up, finding new ways to support each other and keep the response alive. With renewed commitment from the government, partners, and the international community, we can protect the progress made and continue moving towards ending AIDS as a public health threat.

The Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) leads the global effort to end AIDS as a public health threat by 2030 as part of the Sustainable Development Goals. 

Following the US funding cuts in January, UNAIDS is working closely with governments and partners in affected countries to ensure that all people living with or affected by HIV continue to access life-saving services. For the latest updates, please visit unaids.org

Mr Musk made the remarks during an interview with Bloomberg’s Mishal Husain at the Qatar Economic Forum on 20 May  

GENEVA, 21 May 2025—UNAIDS is deeply encouraged by the statement from Elon Musk that he will fix the current crisis related to a lack of US Government funding for lifesaving HIV services. UNAIDS is tracking daily the impacts of US funding cuts on HIV services for people living with and affected by HIV around the world as the data and stories of impact on UNAIDS website show.  

Currently, many HIV prevention programs supported by the US President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) have been stalled. The Administration issued a limited waiver providing for continuity of some services, including comprehensive HIV testing and treatment, but it is not being fully implemented within countries, and the waiver excludes almost all HIV prevention services except those for pregnant and breastfeeding women.  

For detailed, specific examples of the impact of US funding cuts in dozens of countries see here: Impact of US funding cuts on the global HIV response | UNAIDS 

UNAIDS estimates indicate that the permanent discontinuation of HIV prevention and treatment programmes currently supported by PEPFAR would, between 2025 and 2029, lead to: 

• An additional 6.6 million new HIV Infections.
• Around 2300 additional new HIV infections per day.
• An additional 4.2 million AIDS-related deaths.
• Over 600 additional AIDS-related deaths per day. 

Estimating the potential impact of HIV response disruptions 

We can end the AIDS pandemic, but we cannot do so without continued partnership and leadership by the US on HIV prevention efforts for those most in need. Latest estimates show that 1.3 million people were newly infected with HIV in 2023; many were among the most marginalized and vulnerable groups, including young women and girls. Every week some 4000 young women and girls became infected in 2023.  

Some countries relied on PEPFAR for over 95% of their funding for HIV and while UNAIDS has been supporting countries' transition to self-reliant nationally funded responses, this transition must be done methodically to ensure no more lives are lost during this process. 

UNAIDS has also been impacted by US funding cuts; given the critical roles UNAIDS is playing to build a sustainable future for the AIDS response, the cuts undermine continued progress to end AIDS and transition to sustainability nationally owned and financed HIV responses.  

UNAIDS is encouraged by Mr Musk’s remarks and urges the US to continue their leading role in ending AIDS by restoring HIV prevention and treatment funding to countries most affected by HIV. UNAIDS stands ready to work hand in hand with the US to help support sustainable transitions in the coming months and into the future.

Watch original interview:

UNAIDS

The Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) leads and inspires the world to achieve its shared vision of zero new HIV infections, zero discrimination and zero AIDS-related deaths. UNAIDS unites the efforts of 11 UN organizations—UNHCR, UNICEF, WFP, UNDP, UNFPA, UNODC, UN Women, ILO, UNESCO, WHO and the World Bank—and works closely with global and national partners towards ending the AIDS epidemic by 2030 as part of the Sustainable Development Goals. Learn more at unaids.org and connect with us on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram and YouTube.

UNAIDS Country Director reports on the impact of funding cuts to the HIV response

The HIV response in Zambia, known as a model of success in sub-Saharan Africa, is now facing major challenges following the abrupt and significant cuts to US funding. It has led to widespread disruption: clinics have closed, prevention services have been scaled back, and thousands have lost access to lifesaving medication. Yet the Zambian government and partners are stepping in to protect the progress made. 

In this interview, UNAIDS Country Director for Zambia, Isaac Ahemesah, details the fallout from these funding decisions on health services, vulnerable communities, and the country’s ability to sustain progress against HIV-and outlines what is urgently needed to avert further health crisis. 

Q: How have the US funding cuts impacted the HIV response in Zambia? 

Zambia has long relied on international aid, including substantial support from PEPFAR. Three years ago, the US government’s commitment stood at approximately US$ 402 million, which was subsequently reduced to US$ 392 million, and most recently to US$ 367 million. Despite these reductions, the contribution remains significant, not only to the HIV response, but to Zambia’s overall health sector. To put it in perspective, of the US$ 600 million in total US support to Zambia for development last year, US$ 367 million, around 60%, was allocated to HIV. 

However, the abrupt funding cuts led to the termination of key programmes. More than 11 000 health workers supporting the HIV response, and approximately 23 000 health workers providing services for malaria, tuberculosis, and other health needs, were impacted. 

Several essential initiatives were stopped. These include the closure of 32 wellness centres that served over 20 000 key populations, including LGBTQ+ people, sex workers, and people who inject drugs, across seven of Zambia’s ten provinces. These centres offered critical services such as HIV testing, treatment, and support. 

All DREAMS programmes, which supported adolescent girls and young women in 22 districts, have also been shut down. This has cut off access to HIV prevention, life skills, and economic empowerment activities for thousands of vulnerable girls. 

HIV prevention services have also been disrupted. Sixteen standalone centres providing voluntary medical male circumcision - a proven HIV prevention method - have ceased operations. Nearly half of Zambia’s pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) services, which help prevent HIV infection, were funded by the US and have now been discontinued. 

Community-led monitoring programmes, which ensured quality and accountability in HIV care, have also been terminated. Furthermore, the Smart Health electronic medical records system, along with platforms used for forecasting and quantifying medical supplies, is no longer operational, making it increasingly difficult to manage patient care and maintain drug inventories.

Q: What will happen if the DREAMS programme is not reinstated? 

Currently, Zambia records approximately 23 000 new HIV infections annually, with about 8700 occurring among young people aged 15 to 24. Notably, 60% of infections in this age group happen among girls.Without support for prevention and treatment interventions, new HIV infections could surge to 180 000 per year by 2030. Among young people, infections could rise to over 60 000 annually by 2030. 

Gender-Based Violence (GBV) remains a growing concern in Zambia, and each GBV case carries a heightened risk of HIV transmission. Addressing this requires a coordinated, multi-sectoral approach that extends beyond HIV alone to include family planning and reproductive health services. National partners are working to reinvigorate this multi-sectoral response so that all relevant sectors-education, gender, internal affairs, and others-actively share responsibility for the HIV response. 

Given the challenges, there is a pressing need to pursue local initiatives and mobilize alternative funding sources to support adolescent girls and young women, safeguarding their health and rights. 

Q: Are there concerns about supplies of HIV medicines? 

Yes, there is significant concern. At present, Zambia has sufficient antiretroviral (ARV) medication to last until the end of the year. However, the US has announced an additional US$50 million cut in funding for medicines and health commodities, effective from next year, due to concerns about drug theft. This will make it extremely difficult to ensure an uninterrupted supply of ARVs, particularly for the most vulnerable populations. There have already been reports of people living with HIV receiving reduced quantities of medication - less than the standard three- to six-month supply - due to ongoing uncertainty and challenges in stock management. 

Q: What is UNAIDS doing to support Zambia during this crisis? 

At the onset of the US funding freeze, UNAIDS immediately partnered with the Ministry of Health to convene national leadership and all key stakeholders. This was critical to coordinate a unified and effective response to the sudden disruption. We quickly led an impact assessment to understand how the freeze was affecting Zambia’s HIV response on the ground. This provided the data needed to guide urgent decisions. 

One of our first steps was to work with the government and partners, we helped define a minimum package of essential HIV services that could realistically be maintained with the reduced resources available. We costed this package at about US$ 147 million and presented it to the Cabinet and Presidency for consideration in the national budget. 

At the same time, we supported the development of the HIV Sustainability Roadmap, which explores alternative domestic financing options. This includes innovative approaches such as leveraging health insurance schemes and introducing total market strategies-for example, making PrEP and vaginal rings available through pharmacies. 

 We also worked closely with the Ministry of Health to revise policies to better fit the current context. For example, we supported allowing longer antiretroviral therapy refills—for up to six months–—to reduce the burden on both patients and the health system. We also helped adjust HIV testing protocols to manage limited supplies more effectively and piloted new service delivery models outside traditional health facilities to expand access. 

 At the operational level, we partnered with WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, and others to monitor weekly stock levels of HIV commodities, ensuring timely responses to shortages. We support civil society organizations, especially those representing key populations, in transitioning clients from closed wellness centers to public health facilities, helping maintain continuity of care. 

To address broader systemic challenges, UNAIDS contributed to the restructuring plan for the Zambia Medicines and Medical Supplies Agency to improve accountability and strengthen the supply chain. 

Our Resource Allocation Forecasting Tool was used to estimate the real cost of sustaining Zambia’s HIV response, which we estimated at around US$ 150 million annually. This tool helps the government and partners plan budgets more effectively. 

UNAIDS acts as the central hub for information-sharing and advocacy around the impact of US funding cuts. We regularly present needs assessments to the UN Country Team and support ongoing fundraising discussions to urgently mobilize resources to sustain services. 

Finally, we have supported training for health workers to promote respectful, non-discriminatory care for key populations now accessing mainstream health services. This is vital to ensure no one is left behind despite the challenges. 

Q: What is the solution to ensure sustainable financing for Zambia’s HIV response, and avoid such a crisis in the future? 

The key to sustainable financing lies in increasing domestic funding and reducing reliance on external donors. While the recent US funding cuts were abrupt and challenging, this situation was not entirely unexpected. For years, Zambia and other countries have been encouraged to take greater ownership of their HIV responses. The real surprise was the speed and scale of the funding reductions. 

To protect its HIV response, Zambia must now mobilize domestic resources. This includes engaging local philanthropic organizations, expanding the role of national health insurance schemes, and ensuring that HIV services are fully integrated within these systems. Innovative models like risk pooling and market-based access to prevention tools, such as making PrEP and vaginal rings available through pharmacies, will also be key to expanding reach and ensuring continuity. 

On the global level, the HIV response must increasingly pivot toward long-acting treatment and prevention options, such as injectable PrEP and antiretroviral treatment. These innovations can help simplify adherence and improve outcomes. 

Zambia is also exploring total market approaches, where the private sector helps supply prevention and treatment services. In addition, local production of ARVs could help reduce costs and improve supply chain stability. 

Critically, the country has already shown that essential HIV services can be maintained on smaller budgets, provided resources are used efficiently. But for long-term sustainability, the government must take the lead. This means prioritizing HIV in the national budget and exploring innovative domestic revenue sources, such as earmarked taxes on alcohol, tobacco, or health products. 

While international partners will remain important, the responsibility for a predictable, sustainable HIV response now rests squarely with Zambia itself—to protect the lives and health of its 1.4 million citizens living with HIV, and to ensure that no one is left behind. 

Q: What’s your message to the international community? 

Today, I believe the global HIV response stands at a crossroads. The decisions we make now will either help the world achieve Sustainable Development Goal 3.3—the target of ending AIDS as a public health threat by 2030—or risk a devastating reversal. 

If we ease up, we could see a return to the 1990s, when new HIV infections spiraled out of control, HIV-related deaths surged, and the global economy suffered greatly.

All we ask for is a final push— a sustained commitment to support countries in fulfilling their promises to end AIDS as a public health threat. I urge the US government and all other donors to reconsider the recent funding cuts. We need to keep our foot firmly on the accelerator until we reach the finish line. 

Otherwise, my greatest fear is that we will return to the dark days of the epidemic, with significant increases in new infections and deaths. 

The Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) leads the global effort to end AIDS as a public health threat by 2030 as part of the Sustainable Development Goals. 

Following the US funding cuts in January, UNAIDS is working closely with governments and partners in affected countries to ensure that all people living with or affected by HIV continue to access life-saving services. For the latest updates, please visit unaids.org 

Eswatini, a country once described as the epicentre of the HIV epidemic with nearly 1 in 3 adults living with HIV in 2015 [adult HIV prevalence in 2015 was 31%]. But Eswatini managed to turn around its HIV epidemic, reducing new HIV infections from a peak of 21 000 per year in 2000 to 4 000 in 2023, a remarkable result, achieved with the support of US funding. 

However, the sudden US funding cuts threaten to undo years of progress. We sat down with Nuha Ceesay, UNAIDS Country Director in Eswatini, to discuss the current situation, the impact on HIV services, and the way forward.

Q: How are US funding cuts impacting Eswatini’s HIV response? 

Eswatini’s HIV response has been a success story, by transforming a crisis that once saw extremely high HIV prevalence rates, into a model of resilience and opportunity. But the recent US funding cuts, representing about half of the country’s HIV response budget, have left the people living with and affected by HIV in despair, the government was not notified and left unprepared, and the people working to end AIDS are in total shock. There is real concern that new HIV infections and AIDS-related deaths will rise, reversing years of hard-won progress. The cuts threaten not just HIV treatment and prevention, but also the broader health system improvements, data collection, jobs and empowerment of people living with HIV. 

Q: What disruptions are being seen on the ground? 

The effects are immediate and widespread. HIV testing services, the gateway to treatment, are now limited. With fewer people being tested, many may unknowingly be infected with HIV, missing the chance for early treatment and increasing the risk of further transmission. This could push annual new infections, which are currently around 4 000, even higher, and add pressure to already strained treatment resources. Stockouts of antiretroviral, lab test kits, and condoms are expected within months, and health worker layoffs are affecting service delivery and quality data collection. Primary prevention services, such as medicine to prevent HIV (PrEP), education campaigns, and voluntary medical male circumcision for HIV prevention (which is around 60% effective in preventing HIV) have also been scaled back or suspended. 

We are also seeing a stop of the DREAMS programme which is a major setback for adolescent girls and young women, who are disproportionately affected by HIV in Eswatini. DREAMS provided prevention education, skills, and socio-economic support to young women. Its termination leaves them more vulnerable to infection and strips away resources that have been central to empowering this high-risk group. HIV prevalence among young women and girls aged between 15 and 24 years was 70% higher than among young men in Eswatini in 2023. 

Read more about the impact on UNAIDS website 

Q: How is UNAIDS responding to these challenges? 

UNAIDS is working closely with the government and partners to continue the work of developing and implementing the HIV Sustainability Roadmap. This will help Eswatini’s HIV response to gradually shift from being reliant on international aid to increasing its domestic funding which will lead to the government taking full ownership of its HIV response. The first phase of this roadmap has already been launched, focusing on building resilience and long-term solutions. 

UNAIDS has also worked closely with the Ministry of Health and partners to map the impact of the funding cuts, identify service gaps, and strategize on mitigating disruptions. Collaboration with the Ministry of Health, UN partners, and civil society remains central, but the transition to sustainability is a complex and gradual process. 

Q: What’s your message to the international community? 

The successes that we celebrate in the HIV response are built on mutual accountability and global solidarity. That’s what enabled countries like Eswatini to shift the narrative-from a crisis by leading a response that brought down new HIV infection to 4 000 compared to when new infections were as high as 21 000. 

It is therefore devastating to see all the hard-won gains being reversed at this stage. This is the moment we need to come together in solidarity and in partnership to accelerate our collective efforts. 

Ending the epidemic is like a marathon. We have run the race many miles, but the end is what matters. If we cannot reach that finish line, it means we have not completed, and we cannot afford that. 

The Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) leads the global effort to end AIDS as a public health threat by 2030 as part of the Sustainable Development Goals. 

Following the US stop work order in January, UNAIDS is working closely with governments and partners in affected countries to ensure that all people living with or affected by HIV continue to access life-saving services. 

For the latest updates, please visit unaids.org 

Q&A with UNAIDS Country Director in Burundi 

International aid is shrinking, and countries are increasingly burdened by the need to prioritize debt repayment over essential services, including healthcare. This shift has left vulnerable populations more exposed, with the abrupt funding cuts by the United States throwing the HIV response in many countries into chaos. Burundi, unfortunately, is no exception. Across the country, HIV services have faced severe disruptions. Clinics are reducing their services, staff are being laid off, and thousands of people living with HIV are at risk of losing access to critical treatment. 

In this interview, Marie Margarete Molnar, UNAIDS Country Director in Burundi, explains how communities are being affected, how the health system is coping, and what must happen next. 

Q: Can you describe the current funding landscape for Burundi’s HIV response? 

Burundi’s HIV response relies heavily on international aid - 95% of its funding comes from donors, with the US government contributing 51% through PEPFAR. This support sustained 10 major projects covering HIV prevention, treatment, and care for both the general population and vulnerable populations. PEPFAR also provided support to community-led monitoring projects and critical data system information. 

Q: How have the recent US funding cuts affected these programmes? 

Out of the 10 PEPFAR-funded projects, three were not eligible for the US waiver and had to stop operating. Some of the remaining seven, although eligible, could not resume their activities due to delays and financial uncertainty. As a result and based on an assessment conducted during the first month of the pause, at least 10 000 people living with HIV—who were among the 79 000 currently under treatment—have been directly affected. These individuals risk losing consistent access to medication and support services. In addition, 167 health professionals have lost their positions. These include doctors, nurses, psychologists, lab technicians, and community health workers—many of whom were directly providing HIV services. Financially, the immediate PEPFAR cut represents approximately US$ 6.5 million from the annual PEPFAR envelope of US$ 25 million for HIV in Burundi. 

Q: What does this mean in practical terms for people on the ground?

Burundi had almost reached the 2025 ambitious targets: 95% of people living with HIV who know their HIV status, of whom 95% are on treatment and of the people on treatment 95% are virally suppressed. This was the result of strong collaboration between the government, civil society organizations and partners. The country was even recognized with an award. But now the third 95, on viral suppression, is declining because some people can no longer access viral load testing or follow-up services. If the situation continues, there is a high risk of an increase in new infections and a weakening of the entire HIV response system. 

Q: What steps have the government and partners taken so far to respond to the crisis? 

The government and partners acted quickly. UNAIDS conducted consultations during the first two weeks of February with key stakeholders. These consultations identified the scale of the impact and led to a series of recommendations that were shared with the Government and partners. The Ministry of Health together with UNAIDS and WHO held a two-day workshop with the PEPFAR implementing partners and civil society to understand how the cuts affected budgets, staffing, services, and beneficiaries and to brainstorm on rapid mitigation measures. As instances, it was recommended carrying out field missions to visit treatment sites and assess how services were coping without US support, forming a crisis response group and developing a national contingency plan. The government also began to identify treatment sites facing ARV shortages and organized a drug quantification workshop after PEPFAR-supported partners could no longer lead it. 

Finalizing the HIV Sustainability Roadmap has also become a top priority. The roadmap is intended to guide how Burundi can finance and manage its HIV response without relying so heavily on external donors. We also discussed modeling different scenarios, from best case to worst case, based on whether funding returns or disappears entirely. These models would help us plan, reprioritize, and adapt strategies accordingly. We are also using the UNAIDS Rapid AIDS Financing Tool (RAFT) to get detailed data on how the funding cut is affecting commodities and staffing across the country. 

Q: Is the government prepared to increase its contribution to its national HIV efforts? 

It’s trying. Previously, funding for antiretroviral treatment was split between 76% from the Global Fund, 15% from the government, and 9% from PEPFAR. The government has now committed to covering partially that missing 9%. That shows political will. But it’s not just about medicine. It’s about health workers, community programmes and lab capacity. Burundi will need to restructure its approach by, for instance, integrating HIV into broader health and social protection systems, and significantly increase domestic health funding to reduce dependency, but this is difficult given the country's economic constraints. 

Q: What’s your message to the international community? 

Burundi is a fragile country facing multiple crises—economic instability, fuel shortages, emerging epidemics, and an influx of refugees from neighboring Democratic Republic of Congo. Despite these challenges, the country has made significant progress towards ending HIV, thanks to sustained investment in health including the HIV response. The risk now is losing these gains. Continued support from international partners is essential, not just for health but for the country’s overall development. At the same time, the Burundian government must increase its commitment to health funding. Only through global solidarity and strong political will can Burundi hope to end HIV by 2030. 

The global community must understand that this is more than a budget line. It’s about lives, stability and global health security. 

The Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) leads the global effort to end AIDS as a public health threat by 2030 as part of the Sustainable Development Goals. 

Following the US stop work order in January, UNAIDS is working closely with governments and partners in affected countries to ensure that all people living with or affected by HIV continue to access life-saving services. For the latest updates, please visit unaids.org 

Community-led organizations are the backbone of the HIV response in many countries, providing access to HIV services for key populations, advocating for human rights and monitoring the HIV response. However, data collected by community-led organizations shows mass shut-downs of life-saving, peer-led services, significant – or total – budget cuts, staff lay-offs and rising levels of stigma, discrimination and mortality rates.   

Two new key population-led reports, one by Global Black Gay Men Connect (GBGMC) and another by the International Network of People Who Use Drugs (INPUD), document the consequences of the US President’s Executive Order in January 2025 which froze all US foreign assistance. These reports highlight how services led by and for key populations are facing deep uncertainty about their future due to the funding cuts and loss of staff.

In its Frozen Out report, GBGMC found that 36% of partners supported by the US President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) shut down within one week of the Executive Order. Another 19% said they could not operate beyond one month without renewed support. Similarly, INPUD’s report The Human Cost of Policy Shifts describes significant disruptions across harm reduction programmes. Nearly half (45%) of the organizations surveyed reported major budget losses, and one in four lost between 75% and 100% of their harm reduction programming. Critical services including peer-led outreach, HIV and hepatitis C testing, opioid agonist therapy, and overdose prevention have been disrupted. 

A cascading crisis 

The GBGMC report states that nearly 93% of key population-serving partners in Kenya reported experiencing full or partial service shutdowns. In Nigeria, every PEPFAR implementing partner providing services to key populations was reportedly affected. Across Kenya, Uganda and Nigeria, an estimated 2.2 million people have lost access to key population-focused HIV prevention services. 

The report also warns that even short-term interruptions can have life-threatening consequences. Each day, an estimated 200,000 people rely on receiving their HIV treatment through US government-funded sites. Interruptions risk treatment failure, HIV transmission and the emergence of resistance to HIV medicines. Prevention efforts are also at risk, with US government funding supporting nearly 90% of global pre-exposure prophylactic (PrEP) initiatives. 

“The PEPFAR funding freeze has led to the closure of numerous organizations and the disruption of essential HIV prevention services, leaving millions at risk. Immediate action is imperative to restore funding and protect key populations from further harm,” says Micheal Ighodaro, Executive Director of GBGMC 

Impacts on organizations led by people who use drugs 

INPUD’s report, The Human Cost of Policy Shifts, provides a detailed picture of how harm reduction services have been devastated by the US funding cuts. Based on a global rapid assessment of 101 respondents, the report reveals that nearly half lost between 26% and 100% of their harm reduction budgets, and 23% lost more than three-quarters of their funding.  

The most disrupted services included peer-led outreach (41%), legal and human rights support (36%), HIV testing (35%), services for women who use drugs (33%), and overdose prevention (25%). The consequences for individuals and communities have been severe. 47% of organizations reported that people are now going without harm reduction supplies such as sterile syringes and naloxone, and 46% said people are relying on underground or informal networks for access. 30% observed increases in overdose deaths. Additionally, 62% of organizations documented rising stigma and discrimination against people who use drugs. 

The report also highlights a particularly stark impact on women who use drugs. Of the 54 organizations that previously offered tailored services for women, 68% halted outreach, and over a third had to reduce or close services altogether.  

“While increasing overall funding is important, it is equally vital to ensure that organizations led by people who use drugs receive targeted support to run harm reduction services that effectively address their communities’ unique challenges and needs," says Anton Basenko, Executive Director of INPUD 

Heightened stigma and structural risks 

Even before the funding cuts, key populations faced legal and social barriers 
including criminalization, discrimination, and denial of services. According to reports gathered through UNAIDS’ dialogues with global and regional networks, these challenges are now intensifying. Community organizations have documented a rise in harassment, hate speech and healthcare discrimination. In some countries, specialized clinics are being “mainstreamed” into general health systems without adequate training or protections ensuring safe access. 

UNAIDS’ response and coordinated action 

Since February 2025, UNAIDS has been convening biweekly virtual dialogues with global key population networks, civil society advocates and international partners to share updates, raise concerns, and coordinate efforts to protect HIV services. At the regional level, UNAIDS is also convening with networks and joining forces to document the impact of funding disruptions and shape collective responses. These engagements have informed UNAIDS’ advocacy and programming supporting the launch of tools like the Rapid Action Financing Tool, strengthening country-level tracking through the UNAIDS impact portal (launched in early 2025) and amplifying community voices at global forums such as the UN’s Commission on the Status of Women and the Human Rights Council. Through continued collaboration with country teams, regional networks, and civil society, UNAIDS remains committed to co-creating solutions and prioritizing community-led responses. 

A call for urgent action 

GBGMC and INPUD urge governments, donors, and development partners to take immediate steps to: 

• Restore and increase funding for community-led and key population-focused services and establish dedicated funding streams for key population-led organizations   
• Establish pooled emergency funding mechanisms to sustain prevention and harm reduction
• Ensure meaningful community engagement in funding, service design, and legal reform
• Protect peer-led HIV services, which are grounded in principles of dignity, safety, and equitable access 

As the global HIV response faces rising risks, UNAIDS shifts to a leaner, sharper model focused on country impact 

GENEVA, 10 May 2025—In the face of continued high numbers of new HIV infections and declining global funding, the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) is launching a bold transformation to support countries in ending AIDS as a public health threat by 2030, and to ensure the HIV response remains strong and sustainable into the future. This shift will help governments and communities transition to a sustainable and domestically financed HIV response, grounded in data, equity, and human rights.

“UNAIDS’ transformation is a direct response to a fast-changing landscape, from a shifting geopolitical context to shrinking resources,” said Winnie Byanyima, Executive Director of UNAIDS. “We are reshaping how we work so that we can support inclusive, community led, multisectoral national HIV responses with greater precision and impact.”

UNAIDS restructuring and reform processes are closely aligned with wider UN processes through the UN80 initiative and promote enhanced efficiency, integration, consolidation and coordination.

The restructuring of the UNAIDS Secretariat is informed by the work of a High-Level Panel which has been working since October 2024. The Panel called for transforming the Joint Programme now and through to 2030 and recommended a smaller, sharper focused model for the Secretariat. It called on the Secretariat to focus on four core functions: leadership; convening and coordination; accountability; and community engagement.

Disruptions in the HIV response 

UNAIDS modelling suggests that we are now seeing 2300 additional new HIV infections every day on top of the 3500 infections that were already occurring. These reversals are happening as a result of human rights push backs on women and girls and key populations coupled with disruptions in lifesaving services as international assistance from donor countries stopped. UNAIDS estimates that the funding cuts could lead to an additional 6.6 million new HIV infections and 4.2 million AIDS-related deaths by 2029. A tragedy for people living with and affected by HIV.

Reshaping to deliver in a changing context 

UNAIDS is facing a big transition and is reforming to continue to support the response in the most efficient and cost-effective way. The Secretariat is consolidating its country footprint and will be moving global staff to be closer to the people we serve.

The physical in-country presence of the Secretariat will be reduced to approximately 35 countries while continuing to be able to support around 60 countries directly. The change is based on a typology of countries with high HIV burden, significant stigma and discrimination against key populations, and heavy reliance on international aid for the HIV response. The restructuring plan includes a 54% reduction in Secretariat staffing strength to ensure UNAIDS is fit for purpose and working within current core resource forecasts.

UNAIDS’ transformation is about supporting countries to protect the critical gains made in stopping new HIV infections and preventing AIDS-related deaths. UNAIDS will continue to support countries in monitoring their epidemics and making strategic investments for HIV prevention and treatment, as well as addressing human rights and policy barriers. It will convene partners, engage communities and stand with people living with and affected by HIV.

“This is a moment for global solidarity,” said Ms Byanyima. “With determination, and partnership, together we can still achieve the goal of ending AIDS as a public health threat by 2030 and ensure sustainable, inclusive, multisectoral national HIV responses into the future.”

In 2025, UNAIDS will shape and deliver a new Global AIDS Strategy to accelerate political, programmatic and financial commitment and sustainability and provide guidance to drive progress towards the goal of ending AIDS as a public health threat by 2030. The Strategy will be adopted by the UNAIDS Programme Coordinating Board in December 2025. It will provide the foundation for a new Political Declaration and 2030 HIV targets, to be adopted by a High-Level Meeting of the UN General Assembly in 2026.

UNAIDS

The Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) leads and inspires the world to achieve its shared vision of zero new HIV infections, zero discrimination and zero AIDS-related deaths. UNAIDS unites the efforts of 11 UN organizations—UNHCR, UNICEF, WFP, UNDP, UNFPA, UNODC, UN Women, ILO, UNESCO, WHO and the World Bank—and works closely with global and national partners towards ending the AIDS epidemic by 2030 as part of the Sustainable Development Goals. Learn more at unaids.org and connect with us on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram and YouTube.

On the outskirts of Bishkek, the capital of Kyrgyzstan, a small house converted into a shelter welcomes people recently released from prison. The shelter is funded by the Global Fund/UNDP project “Effective Control of HIV Infection and Tuberculosis in the Kyrgyz Republic.”

Madina Toktogulova, head of the public foundation Istikhsan, which supports the shelter, is preparing to welcome her clients.

For 25 years, Madina has worked with people in prison, people who use drugs, and those living with HIV and tuberculosis. As a community representative, she was at the forefront of establishing the country’s first grassroots initiatives, self-help groups, and community-based organizations. She played a key role in developing social support and rehabilitation programmes for people in vulnerable situations.

Together with a group of like-minded colleagues, she established the country’s first peer support groups in correctional facilities. They persuaded prison administrations of the importance of providing HIV prevention services, including harm reduction, to people in prisons; they built relationships with prison health professionals, social workers, and psychologists; implemented HIV prevention projects; and helped people newly released from prison who had no place to stay, clothes, or money to return home.

Dr Gulsara Kukanova, a physician at the FSIN hospital-polyclinic in Kyrgyzstan, stressed how vital organizations like Istikhsan are the moment people are released from prison as some stop taking antiretroviral treatment or relapse into drug use. “We partner with organizations like Istikhsan and witness people rebuilding their lives — finding jobs, reuniting with family. Offering hope to someone who has lost it is invaluable.”

Madina knows that without food, shelter, or ID, HIV treatment is not a priority. That’s why she advocates for a comprehensive approach to reintegration.

“People need more than just medical care. They need psychological support, help finding a job, restoring their documents. Non-governmental organizations, with donor support, play this essential role — helping people rediscover themselves,” she explains.

Istikhsan’s work focuses on supporting incarcerated women. Madina says women are more emotionally vulnerable, more affected by violence – the harsh reality of prisons, trauma, stigma, and self-stigma. They are more likely to give up on therapy and lose hope.

“Society forgives men more easily. Women with a prison history are judged more harshly. Maybe because I’m a woman, I feel their pain more deeply,” she says.

The organization is currently providing support to all women living with HIV in a nearby prison. Thanks to their efforts, more than 20 women have been able to restore their identity documents, dozens are receiving psychological and medical support, starting HIV treatment, reconnecting with children, finding jobs, and reintegrating into society.

But all of this is now at risk. HIV prevention efforts built over years through partnerships with government, civil society, and international institutions face collapse due to shrinking funding from key donors, including PEPFAR and the Global Fund.

According to Madina, a systemic approach to reintegration is impossible without cooperation between government institutions and civil society.

“We have a very good probation law that provides a legal framework for supporting people on the path to resocialization. However, as with any system, there are times when resources and human capacity are not sufficient to reach everyone in need. That’s when civil society can step in — in partnership with the state and within the framework of the existing legislation,” she emphasizes.

While the Kyrgyz government fully covers HIV treatment, there’s a real risk that essential social and prevention services — post-release support, reintegration, temporary housing, documentation help, hygiene kits — will be lost without external aid.

“The loss of funding could dismantle the entire support system for women living with HIV in prison. These programmes are not charity; they’re investments in resilient health and social protection systems that can operate independently. Investing now means building a future where everyone’s right to health is protected,” says Meerim Sarybaeva, UNAIDS Country Director in Kyrgyzstan.

“For the first time, we’ve created a model where probation services, prisons, and NGOs collaborate daily, so no one falls through the cracks,” says Chinara Maatkerimova, Programme Officer at UNODC in Kyrgyzstan.

“If we disappear, who will hear them?” Madina asks. But she’s determined to continue — even if it means starting over — to advocate for sustainable funding and rebuild a system where every person, regardless of their past, has a right to health and a future.

As of April 1, 2025, Kyrgyzstan has reported 14,609 cases of HIV. Of these, 61.8% were transmitted sexually and 27.8% through injection drug use. HIV is increasingly being detected among people outside of traditional key populations — a sign of the epidemic’s broader spread in the country.